their contributions,
I
do not think
that such a proposal
should be adopted.
debe cimilar proposal made
Lin
another Tolong
and ordinance allowing
Sofds
disallowed
wat
pared bake my
orcestor
As dircted its
play
xoxt on
the
ground that it was
desirable to prevent
the possibility of any Ex civil servant leaving
A
widow altogether
M2 Johnson
I suppose it was mi Chamberla
Out5/4
The proposal is also abjectionable for the
given.
Improvided for and also mason jeden n
5. Section 13 of Ordevance Jordwwance
No 15
then for
g1900
should
rmain
unchanged, but in
order to reduce as
par. "I of the meand
memo
accompanying
Mr Youngs, lr.
Effy
044
far
Excessur
possible the
number
57
persons with small
claims
upon the Gos
Lowning to officers
505
stiring after very short penods of
service) who nfered to in paragraph 2`67-
22
In may's desp no 33 of 23th January 1904,
would suggest
&
that such subordinate
ffriers should in the first instance be apponited on probation for 3 years during
which period they
would not be contributors to the
WoO Pension Fund
suice by the definition of Public Officer " section 2 of orde
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.